Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 10:35:22 +0300 Reply-To: Hebrew TeX list <[log in to unmask]> Sender: Hebrew TeX list <[log in to unmask]> From: Tzafrir Cohen <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Hebrew numbers in TeX In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:49:33AM +0300, Ron Artstein wrote: > Tzafrir, > > Thanks for putting the style file as an attachment. I don't know > why this didn't occur to me :) > > > Side note: > > > > \Alphfinal and \Hebrewnumeralfinal don't seem to produce > > different results than \Alph and \Hebrewnumeral, accordingly. > > I'll try to look into this later. > > Have you tried numbers above 100? In the current implementation, > \Alphfinal and \Hebrewnumeralfinal produce an initial letter > if no hundreds digit is present, so you only see their effect > starting with 120 (qof-"-finalkaf). It works for me, even with > \pagenumbering{\Alphfinal} (lots of \newpage commands...). Something simpler, that will keep you from flipping pages: \documentclass[twocolumns]{article} \usepackage[english,hebrew]{babel} \usepackage{hebnum} \begin{document} \renewcommand{\theenumi}{\Alphfinal{enumi}} \begin{enumerate} \setcounter{enumi}{20} \whiledo{\value{enumi}< 65}{\item \arabic{enumi}} \end{enumerate} \end{document} > What the desired behavior should be depends on how years without > hundreds are traditionally written. Since A.D. 1290 (he' nun') was > the year when the expulsion of Jews from England took place, there > must be plenty of references to it in Jewish sources. It's just a > matter of tracking them down and finding out if they used initial > or final nun. What's wrong with that form? -- Tzafrir Cohen +---------------------------+ http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/ |vim is a mutt's best friend| mailto:[log in to unmask] +---------------------------+  Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main IVRITEX page
 LISTSERV.TAU.AC.IL